At the brink: the ‘limited’ strike
To all those cheering along from
the sidelines (Arab League) and hoping the US
‘limited’ strike on Syria
would somehow tip the scales in favor of the Syrian opposition and the Free
Syrian Army, think again! This foolhardy strike would have truly ‘catastrophic’
consequences as the Russians have warned. Iran
is prepared to retaliate should the US
strike Syria , but not
against US military targets
against Israel . An attack
on Syria “means the
immediate destruction of Israel ,”
said General Mohammad Ali Jafari, chief of Iran ’s Revolutionary Guards.
Even if Iran
does not retaliate, Syria
could and probably will. Many seem to think that because the regime did not
retaliate against Israel
whenever the later bombed targets within Syria
that the regime would absorb the US hit and not strike back. The
regime was always wary to maintain a tense stand off at all times with
Israel, not wishing to give the US or Israel any excuse to attempt regime
change in Syria, but this proposed strike will be a game changer.
There is no doubt the Syrian regime has
the capability to strike back. It has the advanced P-800 Yakhont supersonic
anti-ship missile which has a 300km range and can in theory target and hit US
warships now stationed in the Eastern Mediterranean .
Syria could also fire
surface to surface missiles at Israel ,
and Syria ’s air defense missile
system, reportedly the best in the world after China
and North Korea ,
could shoot down low-flying, subsonic Tomahawk cruise missiles fired from US
warships.
It can be in the Syrian regime’s interest
to turn this limited fight into a wider regional conflict, this way it could
conceivably turn moral and diplomatic support from Russia into tangible, direct military
and logistics support. If Russia
is not prepared to go to war over Syria
I wonder what it would take for Russia
to actually go to war. If Iran
strikes Israel as it
promises to do if Syria is
hit, would the United States
retaliate and strike Iran ?
And if the US strikes Iran would Russia
stand on the sidelines or would it step in to support its main Middle East ally
Iran ?
The question that everyone is asking above
all is: “Can the US and Russia fight a limited conventional war in the Middle East without using nuclear weapons against each
other?” I think they can and they probably will sooner or later. Since the end
of the Second World War the balance of global power has been frozen in time, so
to speak, the victors in the war are still nominally the official global
military powers. I think many lesser powers are eager to fight a conventional
war, even a limited war in the Middle East, to shake up the global balance of
power, should that happen the US would be relegated to minor power status at
best and a lot of countries would have to start learning Farsi, Chinese or
Russian!
There is no doubt that we stand at a
crucial historic juncture for human civilization, one that could define what
the next two hundred years would be like. It is likely that the deserts, towns
and cities of Arabia will be the battlefield
where such a future war will be fought.
Comments
Post a Comment