The message from Iran: Let's talk
After a resounding US diplomatic defeat and the effective
retreat of US power in the region, whether by accident or by design (a design
by Obama the left wing radical, as some right wing writers in the US claim),
the Rouhani Op-ed comes hot on the heels of Putin's Op-ed at a time of changing
power dynamics regionally and perhaps globally. Both Russia and Iran wish to
appear as the new regional leaders, the wielders of 'soft power', enlightened
and progressive, desirous of dialogue that leads to win-win deals, in other
words eager diplomatic beavers, ready to sponsor dialogue between all parties
in a Middle East long used to zero-sum politics. And the Arabs, they are
no where to be seen on the foreign policy map, they are too busy mopping up the
blood from their streets, cleaning up the wreckage of the so-called Arab
Spring, still embroiled in zero-sum local tribal politics.
If the US failure
was in fact a success for Obama's supposed policy of disengagement from
draining foreign conflicts, then its good news, not just for the American
people whose government will have more money to spend on healthcare and
education and more time to focus on its ailing economy, but for our long
suffering region as well. The days of the W doctrine: 'if you're not with us
you are against us', are over, gone for good, or so one hopes. In place of
hegemonic US power and its liberal use of brute force, is fast emerging a new policy of rapprochement,
an unexpected but welcome result of this supposed Obama policy. For the world,
this appetite for dialogue and talks and a genuine desire to hammer out
'win-win' deals from both Iran
and Russia
is good news because it means we will be spared either a protracted cold war or
a destructive hot war.
For those
Americans sorry to see the US
retreat from the brink and see it as weakening the United
States , I say this: In 1917 and again in 1941, it was not
a hegemonic imperialist United
States that defeated the bully of the time.
In the first instance it was a reluctant isolationist America that went to war and helped defeat the
Kaiser, in the second instance it was an America weakened by years of
depressed economic activity that rose to fight and defeat Nazi Germany and
Imperial Japan. Retreating from the brink, giving up power some times takes
more courage than hurtling head first into an ill-advised military adventure.
So, the times they are changing, they have to,
the US
could not sustain its present level of military commitment abroad for much longer. This policy
shift, if indeed it is a policy shift, had to happen sooner or later. The only
ones who will suffer are US
clients in the region, those political parties and countries that have nailed
their colors to the mast of the USS Sinkalot, and those who continue to press for a
zero-sum outcome which ever side they are on. The new Middle
East is a workshop, a workshop for deal making and the settlement
of long standing conflicts, or so one hopes.
Comments
Post a Comment