Checkmated: The decline of American power, most probably

A game of chess has been played in the Eastern Mediterranean between two giants and the result is plain for all to see. The squirming and writhing and sweaty brow of the American antagonist is evidence of this. The US's chief concern is not for peace in our time or any time, nor is it too concerned about the use of chemical weapons, no, its chief concern is for its own waning, flickering power. No President wants to be the one who presides over the decline of American power. To date the Americans have been brilliant surfers, coasting along on a mighty wave that peeked with victory over Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan and post World War II economic growth. The wave is about to break and its not going to be pleasant.

Syria has the dubious distinction of being the trigger for America's decline as a global policeman. The US cannot afford not to strike after all that has been said, after all the warnings they issued and after nailing their colors to the mast, otherwise they will lose all their power and most of that power rests on smoke and mirrors and bluff for the most part. The image of a tough guy bully is crucial to US policy, without it, without the ability and will to take action, its weapons inventory becomes superfluous, just an expensive pile of scrap metal. 

While the US has 'big guns' and lots of them, what they lack is a profitable enough reason to go to war over Syria. War, like any venture, is a capitalist enterprise, it has to at least pay for itself and this one does not. Also, the first rookie mistake in war is to set up the game in such a way as to allow your opponent to push you to making moves you do not want to make and drag you into a costly military adventure. The first strike is up to the US, the following strikes and their magnitude and type are up to their opponents to determine, after which the US would be committed to putting 'boots on the ground' and not just in Syria in response. 



The US has been checkmated in the most brilliant way, it loses if it strikes and it loses if it doesn't strike. It loses in the second instance by the simple fact that US political ineptitude allowed its competitor, the Russian Federation, to win considerable regional good will and clout especially among the people of the region. Russia's master stroke came with its eleventh hour gambit, offering to sacrifice Syrian chemical weapons to stave off war, weapons that so far have proved more of a liability than an advantage, to which Syria rapidly agreed. This made the Russians look like peacemakers. The whole affair has also been a convenient excuse for Russia to station a permanent naval flotilla in the Mediterranean. The US also loses if its strikes because a strike would plunge the region into the abyss of war. This war will not be a Vietnam-style police action, it wont be a war to topple an aggressor dictator like Saddam, or a crackpot dictator like Qaddafi, it would be a war that involves a complex pattern of alliances akin to that seen in that great regional European war of note, World War I. This war would consign the United Nations to history, much like the Second World War did its predecessor The League of Nations. 

 The winner in the end is anyone's guess, but to those who subscribe to the myth that the righteous will ultimately triumph this war's conclusion may very well see the defeat of the aggressor, i.e. the US, the side which fired the first shot, assuming they go ahead with the strike. And what countries say they will or will not go to war over is one thing before the first shot is fired, quite another after the first shot is fired. There is really no solid ground on which to stand analytically speaking, predicting anything is pointless at the brink of war especially when the stakes are so high.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adultery and the western media's attitude towards Dubai

Here we go again... another British woman charged with adultery in Dubai and the whole of the British and UAE press jump all over it as if its the scoop of the season. I wonder what readers think and in particular British readers? Do they feel ashamed that a compatriot is behind bars because she could not control her animal urges? Well they should be, because this is far from a crime she committed against her husband, with whom she exchanged marital vows, it is a crime against the laws of the UAE. It shows a total lack of regard and respect for the traditions of this conservative Muslim country and it is a slap in the face of every Emirati. Why does the press seem compelled to give such people extensive coverage? One hopes to enlighten the British public as to the pitfalls of sleeping around and its legal repercussions, but in truth its all about money, headlines and a public hungry to devour such shameful scandal. The press are complicit with the mob in elevating such individuals, who
Read more

Orosdi-Back: A lost Beyrouth department store from an elegant age

Image
My mother told me it was located on ‘ Banks Street ’ in Down Town Beirut , the road that leads up to Riad el Solh Square . On most maps the street is also named after Riad el Solh. The store was located opposite Bank Intra, or so I was told. Presumably the location of the store was indicative of the high end goodies on sale inside. The closest comparison to Orosdi Back is the old Allied’s department store in Dubai , for those who remember Dubai in the 1980s. But Orosdi Back was a store from a different age, an age of elegance as opposed to the vulgar modern excesses of the nouveau-riche, something Beirut ’s Down Town is synonymous with! A wonderful blog dubbed ‘language hat’ published some information about the founders of this chain of department stores. According to the blog the chain of stores came about as a result of a partnership between Adolf Orosdi, a Hungarian army officer and his sons who opened a clothing store in Galata in 1855, and the Back family, who were Austro-H
Read more

Lebanon searching for deliverance from the wolves of war, chaos and collapse

Image
There is little to do in Lebanon, little paid work to be done, and what work there is, is pointless and poorly paid. Here we live in the hope that we shall eventually be delivered from the monsters, the wolves of our Lebanese government, Cabinet and Parliament and all the power-brokers that manipulate our lives. I once asked a political science professor “why do politicians always wear suits and ties?” He answered jokingly: “so you don’t see their snake’s skin”, I guess if they wore hats it would be so we don’t see their devil’s horns, or is that meant only for men of the cloth…?   Regardless of which political side you ask about our country’s future, the answer would likely be the same, that things are looking bleak and the blame is always laid at the door of the “other side”, because your interlocutor will never make the mistake of accepting that his/her side shares any of the blame for catastrophe. Lebanese society remains highly polarized politically and ideologically. Archaic reli
Read more