Remembering the Iron Lady, the best she did and the rest
I was amused at the vitriol spouted on Facebook aimed at
the late great Prime Minister of Great Britain and Northern Ireland , Baroness Margaret
Thatcher, may her soul rest in peace. I was equally uplifted by how many people
remembered with gratitude her lasting impact on the modern political debate in
the UK, on issues of the economy, on labor issues, on relations with the US and
Europe.
Above all it is her courage and stubborn determination to
stand up to a militarist bully in Argentina that stands out for me. In
that bold yet risky move, and ignoring all advice not to send troops, Thatcher
reawakened the great British lion from its deep sleep and rebuilt the image of
a once great colonial power in the eyes of the world. Even in her relations
with the US she was constant
in her friendship but firm and unwavering in her criticism of ill advised US military
adventures including the occupation of the Island of Grenada .
It struck me how much Thatcherism has influenced New
Labor and Tony Blair in particular who went further in support of his US ally
than is prudent for any prime minister of any sovereign nation. The fact is,
she was a woman, and as a woman what she did was not only extraordinary it was
not the traditional and expected meek role for a woman and maybe that made her
more hated by her enemies than a man would have been, but also more admired by
her friends and allies for blazing a trail for so many.
I am no Tory, which should be remarkable in view of what
I have written so far in this post. But I do like to be fair and give credit
where credit is due. Maggie came to the premiership at a time in the UK ’s history
when labor unions had turned from ‘healthy cells’ in the body politic that helped workers obtain
their rights through collective bargaining, to a cancerous growth that overwhelmed a weak government and threatened civic order and the economic health of a country.
In Lebanon
we had a small dose of what unions can do. Civil service and teachers' unions made
life very difficult over the past months, especially
for students of public schools who missed an entire month of schooling as a
result of the strike action. I am all for social justice, for helping the
poorest in society to have access to food, shelter, education and health care
and to earn a living wage. But I am also cognizant of the need to maintain the
stability of the national currency, to curtail excessive borrowing that fuels excessive public sector spending, to privatize vital utilities like the electricity
company and the telecoms sector, to make them competitive rather than a drain on
state resources, like EDL, or a tool for indiscriminate indirect taxation as telecoms has become.
So, for me I can only dream that a Thatcher-like figure would
come along with enough vision, political support and enough votes to come into office and sweep away
the caked dust from our aging institutions, from our economy, and take courageous
decisions. Of course not all Thatcher's policies were right, but the fact she recognized the need for change, the need to sweep away the old decaying structures of a once flourishing industrial past, that was what made her right for that particular time.
I would like to see a more equitable distribution of resources throughout Lebanon, more development in the North, the South and the Bekaa, higher and fairer taxes on high income earners, which Maggie might not agree with me on, but it is nonetheless essential for us. I would like to see someone come in and sweep away clientelism and nepotism and the entrenched political class, now that would be a miracle.
I would like to see a more equitable distribution of resources throughout Lebanon, more development in the North, the South and the Bekaa, higher and fairer taxes on high income earners, which Maggie might not agree with me on, but it is nonetheless essential for us. I would like to see someone come in and sweep away clientelism and nepotism and the entrenched political class, now that would be a miracle.
Thatcher’s failing was her inability to show sympathy
for the plight of the communities her policies affected the most and in many
cases helped destroy, not that her aim was to destroy, but rather to revive a
country by cutting away dead flesh. Her other fault was her own hubris that
eventually led to her downfall when her own Cabinet turned against her. No
extreme ideology is without fault, every one of them in living memory has left
countless victims in their wake. Thatcher proved that, Communism in the USSR proved
that, but they make great history. So, love her or hate her, you will remember
her and so will generations to come.
Comments
Post a Comment