No, No, No, to the Orthodox gathering election law
While the proposed election law dubbed the Orthodox
gathering law offers a simple solution to a serious problem, the fact so many
voters are not fairly represented in the existing electoral system, the
medicine in this case will likely kill the patient.
I am a Latin Christian from Ras Beirut, I am classified
under the broad umbrella of ‘minorities’ which means my vote has little to no
impact in my district, or so I’m told. The fault does not lie with the democratic
process itself, it lies with the way parliamentary seats are distributed on a
sectarian basis for each district. Instead of any citizen from any sect running
in any district to be elected (or not) by any citizen of voting age in that
district no matter what their sect based on the principle of ‘one-man-one-vote’,
our system makes voting for some almost pointless.
Our system is so convoluted that understanding it is like
trying to correctly guess which one of the three cards on the table is the
queen of hearts!
There is no doubt that there is a great deal of injustice in
the present system, I and those in my situation should know. But, the Orthodox
gathering law is not the answer, its actually part of the problem. It’s like
tilting the Earth to fix the problem of a lopsided wall!
In Lebanon
the homogenization of Christians or individual Christian sects into one block
to face other sects actually deepens sectarian rifts and makes sectarian
divisions something pervasive. The deep sectarian divisions we see today in the
country have to be classified as aberrations, something that will pass
eventually.
Maronite voting for Maronite, Orthodox voting for Orthodox,
Catholic voting for Catholic, like voting for like reduces politics and the
parliamentary process to a council of religious figureheads who speak on behalf
of their sects for the narrow interests of those sect. Who then will speak for the
wider national good that is supposed to transcend individual sectarian
concerns? Who then will speak for those who choose not to have their religious figureheads
speak on their behalf?
Parliament is not supposed to represent sects, it’s supposed
to speak for every single one of us as citizens not as members of a religion. Parliament
is not a council of religious figureheads, its not a bazaar where sects argue
over privileges and shares of the national pie, its where wider national issues
should be discussed.
Instead of a law made to fit the sectarian system, which
would turn out as bad as the sectarian system it was designed for, we should
implement the Taif constitution fully, take sectarianism out of Parliament, and
set up an upper house of parliament instead where sects are represented. This
does not require promulgation of new laws to achieve, it’s already stipulated
in the Taif constitution, our MPs just have to implement it, but none have the
courage to do it. Like the people they represent, MPs are fearful of letting go
of sectarianism because then they would have no issues to argue over, how will
they play politics then?
Comments
Post a Comment