No, No, No, to the Orthodox gathering election law


While the proposed election law dubbed the Orthodox gathering law offers a simple solution to a serious problem, the fact so many voters are not fairly represented in the existing electoral system, the medicine in this case will likely kill the patient.

 
I am a Latin Christian from Ras Beirut, I am classified under the broad umbrella of ‘minorities’ which means my vote has little to no impact in my district, or so I’m told. The fault does not lie with the democratic process itself, it lies with the way parliamentary seats are distributed on a sectarian basis for each district. Instead of any citizen from any sect running in any district to be elected (or not) by any citizen of voting age in that district no matter what their sect based on the principle of ‘one-man-one-vote’, our system makes voting for some almost pointless.

 
Our system is so convoluted that understanding it is like trying to correctly guess which one of the three cards on the table is the queen of hearts!

 
There is no doubt that there is a great deal of injustice in the present system, I and those in my situation should know. But, the Orthodox gathering law is not the answer, its actually part of the problem. It’s like tilting the Earth to fix the problem of a lopsided wall!

 
In Lebanon the homogenization of Christians or individual Christian sects into one block to face other sects actually deepens sectarian rifts and makes sectarian divisions something pervasive. The deep sectarian divisions we see today in the country have to be classified as aberrations, something that will pass eventually.

 
Maronite voting for Maronite, Orthodox voting for Orthodox, Catholic voting for Catholic, like voting for like reduces politics and the parliamentary process to a council of religious figureheads who speak on behalf of their sects for the narrow interests of those sect. Who then will speak for the wider national good that is supposed to transcend individual sectarian concerns? Who then will speak for those who choose not to have their religious figureheads speak on their behalf?

 
Parliament is not supposed to represent sects, it’s supposed to speak for every single one of us as citizens not as members of a religion. Parliament is not a council of religious figureheads, its not a bazaar where sects argue over privileges and shares of the national pie, its where wider national issues should be discussed.

 
Instead of a law made to fit the sectarian system, which would turn out as bad as the sectarian system it was designed for, we should implement the Taif constitution fully, take sectarianism out of Parliament, and set up an upper house of parliament instead where sects are represented. This does not require promulgation of new laws to achieve, it’s already stipulated in the Taif constitution, our MPs just have to implement it, but none have the courage to do it. Like the people they represent, MPs are fearful of letting go of sectarianism because then they would have no issues to argue over, how will they play politics then?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adultery and the western media's attitude towards Dubai

Here we go again... another British woman charged with adultery in Dubai and the whole of the British and UAE press jump all over it as if its the scoop of the season. I wonder what readers think and in particular British readers? Do they feel ashamed that a compatriot is behind bars because she could not control her animal urges? Well they should be, because this is far from a crime she committed against her husband, with whom she exchanged marital vows, it is a crime against the laws of the UAE. It shows a total lack of regard and respect for the traditions of this conservative Muslim country and it is a slap in the face of every Emirati. Why does the press seem compelled to give such people extensive coverage? One hopes to enlighten the British public as to the pitfalls of sleeping around and its legal repercussions, but in truth its all about money, headlines and a public hungry to devour such shameful scandal. The press are complicit with the mob in elevating such individuals, who
Read more

Orosdi-Back: A lost Beyrouth department store from an elegant age

Image
My mother told me it was located on ‘ Banks Street ’ in Down Town Beirut , the road that leads up to Riad el Solh Square . On most maps the street is also named after Riad el Solh. The store was located opposite Bank Intra, or so I was told. Presumably the location of the store was indicative of the high end goodies on sale inside. The closest comparison to Orosdi Back is the old Allied’s department store in Dubai , for those who remember Dubai in the 1980s. But Orosdi Back was a store from a different age, an age of elegance as opposed to the vulgar modern excesses of the nouveau-riche, something Beirut ’s Down Town is synonymous with! A wonderful blog dubbed ‘language hat’ published some information about the founders of this chain of department stores. According to the blog the chain of stores came about as a result of a partnership between Adolf Orosdi, a Hungarian army officer and his sons who opened a clothing store in Galata in 1855, and the Back family, who were Austro-H
Read more

Lebanon searching for deliverance from the wolves of war, chaos and collapse

Image
There is little to do in Lebanon, little paid work to be done, and what work there is, is pointless and poorly paid. Here we live in the hope that we shall eventually be delivered from the monsters, the wolves of our Lebanese government, Cabinet and Parliament and all the power-brokers that manipulate our lives. I once asked a political science professor “why do politicians always wear suits and ties?” He answered jokingly: “so you don’t see their snake’s skin”, I guess if they wore hats it would be so we don’t see their devil’s horns, or is that meant only for men of the cloth…?   Regardless of which political side you ask about our country’s future, the answer would likely be the same, that things are looking bleak and the blame is always laid at the door of the “other side”, because your interlocutor will never make the mistake of accepting that his/her side shares any of the blame for catastrophe. Lebanese society remains highly polarized politically and ideologically. Archaic reli
Read more